Condensed Contracts Outline For Law School

A contract is a legal promise

    Industry custom
    Past dealings
    Course of performance
    Express terms

What would the reasonable person believe?
Joking + not reading = no bueno

UCC = Movable & tangible goods

    Predominant Purpose = 1 reason for contract
    Gravamen = break into 2 parts
    Quantity = only required term, unless past dealings would fix it.

########## PHASE 1: FORMATION – PLAN A ##########
Offer = specific manifestation to be bound
Ads are solicitations to bid
Offeror is master, can revoke

Acceptance = clear + unaltered + communicated agreement (except MailBox rule)

    Method, reasonable, consistent unless specified
    Medium, specified, consistent, reasonable, industry custom
    Manner, unilateral (performance) or bilateral (promise)
    Timely, reasonable, specific or lapse
    Moment, must have a moment – UCC doesn’t require

Mailbox Rule acceptance effective on dispatch if proper medium + stamped

Counteroffer not mirror image in material way or too late (except options)

    Rejection by words or conduct
    Lapse by reasonable time, moment conversation ends, longer with written
    Revocation upon receipt before acceptance tendered, indirect, reason to believe
    Incompetence immediately kills offer but not a K and not if performing

Option contracts = separate agreements w/ new C or tender performance.

    Writing & signature required (not for performance)
    Notify if performance not specified (offeree now bound)
    Firm offer UCC, merchant signed writing
    No C needed, Max 3 months

Preliminary negotiation can become K OR agree to agree; bargain in good faith

    Express intent not to be bound till future doc?
    Material terms already determined? How definite/vague?
    Part performance already accepted?
    Usually in writing?

Consideration = bargained for benefit or detriment (usually economic)

    Peppercorn, adequacy of consideration is not determinable.
    Evidentiary and channeling policies.

Not consideration = illusory promises, past performance, pre-existing duties, additional terms, gifts, warm fuzzies, unlawful claims

    Illusory promise, discretionary

Statute of Frauds = requires writing (or record) w/ a signature (or authentication)

    Property, Longer than a year (explicit), $500 goods
    Standard terms acceptable b/c economic and practical benefits
    Sufficient notice? Returnable item? Availability of terms?
    Exceptions = specially manufactured + tender beginning, merchants
    Battle of the forms = acceptance even if additional terms (unless conditional)
    Additional immaterial terms are proposals for contract addition
    Merchants = additional terms are part of the contract unless:
    Explicitly limits, materially alters, timely objection

******* PLAN B *******
Promissory Estoppel = cures C and SOF

    Clear promise
    Should know there would be reliance
    Was reasonable
    Justice requires remedy
    Damages = reliance or rarely expectation

******* PLAN C *******
Unjust Enrichment / Quasi Contract = something valuable requires payment

    Gift or marketing scheme?
    Measurable benefit?
    Rejection opportunity?
    Excuse for no valid contract?

******* PLAN D *******
Moral Obligation = sympathetic realist judge, slim chance

    Enormous benefit to promisor with history of payments

########## PHASE 2: DEFENSES TO FORMATION ##########
Fraud & Misrepresentation = (1) Intentional or reckless (2) material (3) false representation of (4) fact

    Victim’s reliance must be reasonable
    Restitution + possibly punitive damages

Non-disclosure that’s material or relied on is fraud when it’s reasonable to rely and:
Required for good faith (other side can’t find out)

    (Arms length means parties are on equal ground of power)
    Special relationship
    Deceptive Half-truth
    Mistake in integration

Undue Influence = position of power used improperly

Duress = Improper threat to coerce contrary action b/c no reasonable alternative

    Threat of physical harm
    Economic harm: knowledge, causation
    Civil process in bad faith
    Breach good faith contract

Supervening Difficulties: substantial and burdensome difficulty AFTER contract

    Not an error in judgment
    Modification terms must be reasonable

Unconscionable: Shocks the conscience

    Procedural in the bargaining process
    Substantive terms that are draconian

Adhesion: Take-it or leave-it terms. Superior bargaining power. No choice.

    Monopoly? One sided? Waives torts? Who’s likely to insure?

Illegal contracts can’t be enforced – harm public policy.

Public Policy: overreaching (absolving torts)

    Law making infringes on Legislature

Infancy Doctrine: minor can void a contract

    Depreciation? Fake-ID (reasonable investigation). Return C.

Incompetent: void when incompetent

    Adjudicated by a court, following contract voidable
    Cognitively: Evidence of not understanding realities
    Irresistible Urge: Some what irrational. Doesn’t understand consequences.
    Contract fair? Other person know crazy? Performance? Unjust to avoid?

Interpretation: reasonable meaning intended (Can invalidate K)

    Express terms > Current performance > Past dealings > Customs
    Negotiated? Subjective agreement? Know other’s interpretation? Extrinsic evidence? Language issues? Economic issues?

Construction: Adding legal terms (party’s probably intent)

    Gap fillers: if not very material and reasonable

Good faith required in all Ks (reasonable ebb and flow in requirement Ks)

Parol Evidence Rule: limits extrinsic items from impacting written Ks

    No Parol rule in oral Ks
    Helps with ambiguous language, blank items, trade usage
    Fully Integrated: complete and final (even if gaps)
    Explicit? Sophisticated? Merger clause?
    Integrated: final, but can add just not contradict

########## PHASE 4: DEFENSES TO ENFORCEMENT ##########
Mistake: Assumption that certain state of affairs exists

    Material? Unfair? Compelling? Negligent? Misestimation?
    Grab bag rule: seller passes risk on to buyer.

Mutual mistake (FSBMBU)

    Existing fact
    Shared by both
    Basic assumption of K
    Material effect on exchange
    Impacted party did NOT bear the risk
    Unfair to reallocate risk?

Unilateral mistake (FOBMBU) harder to get out of – bad idea?

    Existing fact
    One party mistaken
    Basic assumption of K
    Material effect on exchange to mistaken party
    Mistaken party did NOT bear the risk
    Unconscionable b/c of mistake

Impractical: K becomes impossible to fulfill

    Supervening change
    Impossible / impractical / illegal
    Unforeseeable implies were reasonably careful
    Frustration of purpose: can still perform but purpose is gone
    Material frustration
    Purpose is primary & known by other party
    Basic assumption that purpose wouldn’t be frustrated

########## PHASE 5: BREACH ##########
Anticipatory Repudiation: Undeniable statement or act indicating breach

    Other party does NOT have to perform
    Repudiator may retract if:
    (1) Not due. (2) Other didn’t cancel. (3) Other didn’t materially change. (4)Other didn’t accept the repudiation.
    Assurance can be asked for.

Material Breach: Central, total, non-curable promise equivalent to a condition.

    Can stop performance & sue for damages now
    How harmful? Honest mistake? Economic waste/forfeiture? Unfair? Good faith?
    Opportunity to cure: pretty much before due date
    Clean hands? Partial performance? How much inconvenience?
    UCC not very lenient; deviation of goods or delivery

Substantial Performance usually found to be non-material

    Damages are the cost to cure
    Breacher gets some money under unjust enrichment (quantum meruit)
    Severance is possible where contract can be split up
    Perfect tender rule: UCC
    If goods or delivery(no time left) don’t conform
    Can (1) reject all, (2) accept all, (3) partial

########## PHASE 6: REMEDIES ##########
You can only have one
Expectation: benefits of the K

    Direct: Difference in value (Fair market value, substitute K)
    Consequential not in the contract but arises b/c of breach
    Lost business/profit, injury
    Incidental cost to fix the breach, attorney fees
    Subtract avoided costs

Reliance: costs from reasonably relying on the K

    Promissory estoppel
    K needs to have been a winning/profitable contract

Restitution: give back consideration (down payment)

    Quasi contract / unjust enrichment

Speculative? On notice for potential damages? Mitigate damages?

Equitable Relief: specific performance, injunction, recission, modification (damages possible too)
(1) Extraordinary, damages are inadequate, (2) Discretionary, judge not required, (3) Clear K, no ambiguity / uncertainty, (4) Resist supervision, clean & quick relief
Good faith?

Liquidated Damages: pre stipulated damages (can’t be a penalty)

    Reasonable to anticipation of loss? OR
    Reasonable to actual damages? AND
    Difficulty in determining damages?
    Trivial breach? Sliding scale?

Economic Efficient Breach: makes $ense to breach